
Side-by-side comparison of Devin and GitHub Copilot — pricing, features, and use cases. Reviewed by our editorial team in Aug 2026.


Devin and GitHub Copilot represent two fundamentally different bets on how AI changes software engineering, and by mid-2026 the line between them is blurring rather than disappearing.
Devin, built by Cognition AI, is an autonomous AI software engineer that takes tasks from project management tools like Linear, Jira, and Slack, and autonomously writes code, creates pull requests, runs tests, and iterates on feedback — functioning as a virtual engineering team member rather than a code completion tool.
GitHub Copilot started life as inline autocomplete and has since metastasized into something much broader.
At GitHub Universe 2025, GitHub announced Agent HQ, a control plane that orchestrates agents from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Cognition, and xAI across GitHub, VS Code, CLI, and Mobile under a single Copilot subscription — positioning itself as the interface for all coding agents, not just the home for GitHub's own.
The operational difference still matters. Devin has its own IDE, shell, and browser running in the cloud. It can install dependencies, run build scripts, execute tests, browse documentation, and debug issues — just like a human developer at their workstation.
As of February 24, 2026, Devin 2.2 has full access to its own Linux desktop so it can launch and test desktop applications too — after creating a PR, Devin will suggest testing it on its desktop, run through your app, and send back screen recordings so you can review every detail of its work.
Copilot's equivalent is the cloud agent: while working on a coding task, Copilot cloud agent has access to its own ephemeral development environment, powered by GitHub Actions, where it can explore your code, make changes, execute automated tests and linters and more.
As of February 2026, GitHub Copilot coding agent includes a model picker, self-review, built-in security scanning, custom agents, and CLI handoff.
Benchmark reality checks the autonomy hype. Devin 2.0 scores 45.8% on SWE-Bench Verified in standard unassisted evaluation — several agents with better-optimized scaffolds on stronger base models score significantly higher.
When GitHub announced Copilot agent mode with Claude 3.7 Sonnet in April 2025, it posted a 56% pass rate on SWE-bench Verified.
Copilot also benefits from being a multi-model platform — model selection is now available for the Claude and Codex third-party coding agents on github.com, giving you access to the latest and most capable models as they become available.
Pricing tells the clearest story about who each tool is for. Copilot has a free tier, a low-cost Pro tier, and Business/Enterprise tiers, all flat-rate per seat.
Devin offers three plans: Core (pay-as-you-go with ACUs), Team with 250 ACUs included, and Enterprise with custom pricing including VPC deployment and SAML SSO.
ACU stands for Agent Compute Unit — Devin's billing metric that combines compute time, model inference, and tool usage into a single number, and the exact cost per task varies significantly depending on complexity. The practical result: Copilot is predictable at scale; Devin is consumption-metered and can spike on long-running tasks.
Async backlog tickets and migrations
Devin is purpose-built for fire-and-forget work. Nubank ran it on a 6M+ LOC migration, and the Jira/Slack-to-PR workflow needs no human at the keyboard between assignment and review.
Daily in-editor coding for individual developers
Copilot's inline completions, Next Edit Suggestions, and agent mode live inside VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, Eclipse, and Xcode at a flat per-seat price — Devin has no IDE inline experience.
Multi-model agent orchestration in one subscription
Through Agent HQ, Copilot lets you assign work to Claude, OpenAI Codex, or its own cloud agent from a single panel — Devin is locked to Cognition's stack.
5 use cases scored. Devin wins 1, GitHub Copilot wins 3.
GitHub Copilot publishes a starting price of $10; Devin does not.
GitHub Copilot offers a free tier; Devin is paid only.
Both sit near 4.9 / 5 across user reviews.
Devin has 237 ratings vs 215 on the other.
GitHub Copilot ranks in our Flagship tier; Devin sits in the Leader tier.
Where each tool earns its rating — and where it falls short.



Every spec on one page. Live-pulled from each tool's detail page.
Quick answers to the questions readers ask before picking between these two.
Yes for fire-and-forget tasks, no for everyday coding. Devin is designed for end-to-end autonomy on well-scoped tickets — it plans, codes, tests, and opens a PR with no human in the loop. Copilot's cloud agent does similar async work but is generally framed around discrete GitHub issues, and Copilot's strength remains the inline and chat experience inside your IDE.
Devin is meaningfully more expensive at scale because it bills per Agent Compute Unit on top of a base subscription, while Copilot is flat-rate per seat. Devin offers Core (pay-as-you-go), Team (250 ACUs included), and Enterprise (VPC, SSO) tiers. Copilot has a free tier, Pro, Pro+, Business, and Enterprise — all per-seat with no usage metering on the base subscription, though premium model requests are budgeted monthly.
Devin 2.0 scores 45.8% on SWE-Bench Verified in standard unassisted evaluation, per April 2026 leaderboard data. That trails carefully scaffolded agents on Claude Opus 4.5 (around 80.9% on Verified) and well below newer benchmarks like SWE-bench Pro where even top models drop into the 45–57% range. Cognition argues Devin optimizes for real-world usability over benchmark scores.
Not quite, but the gap is closing fast. Copilot's cloud agent, launched GA in September 2025, runs inside a sandboxed GitHub Actions environment, pushes commits to a draft PR, runs tests, and requests review — similar to Devin's autonomous workflow. Devin still has a fuller sandbox (Linux desktop, browser, terminal, IDE) and tighter Linear/Jira/Slack integration for true ticket-to-PR autonomy.
GitHub Copilot is the lower-friction choice for most enterprises; Devin wins when autonomous backlog work is the explicit goal. Copilot Business and Enterprise offer per-seat predictability, audit logs, custom instructions, and Agent HQ orchestration across Claude, Codex, and Copilot's own agent. Devin's VPC deployment and forthcoming FedRAMP High authorization make it the stronger pick for regulated industries that want code to never leave their cloud.
No, Devin is not an IDE extension. It runs in its own cloud-based environment with a browser, terminal, and code editor (built on VS Code Web), and you interact with it through Slack, Linear, Jira, or its web app. Copilot is the opposite — inline completions and chat live inside VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains, Neovim, Eclipse, and Xcode.
Yes, and many teams in 2026 do exactly that. Use Copilot inside the IDE for the moment-to-moment writing of code — completions, refactors, chat, agent-mode edits — and hand Devin the well-defined backlog tickets (migrations, test coverage, dependency upgrades) you don't want to context-switch into. Through Agent HQ, GitHub even orchestrates Cognition's agent from inside Copilot.
If your engineering organization has a backlog of well-scoped, well-specified tickets — framework upgrades, codemods, test generation, dependency bumps across hundreds of files — Devin is the closer tool.
Nubank running it on a 6M+ LOC migration is the canonical example, and Devin 2.2's self-review-before-PR loop plus the Linux desktop QA capability mean less rework on the human review side.
The ACU bill is real, though, so this only pencils out when the cost of reviewing AI output is meaningfully lower than the cost of an engineer doing the work manually.
GitHub Copilot is the right default for almost every other situation.
Solo developers, startup teams, and any organization that lives in VS Code or JetBrains get more value per dollar from Copilot Pro than from anything else in the category — inline completions, chat, agent mode, the CLI, and the cloud agent are all included, with Claude and Codex available as third-party agents under the same subscription.
Enterprises that need predictable per-seat budgeting, SOC 2 posture, and audit trails will also find Copilot's procurement path easier than Devin's ACU consumption model.
The two tools are not mutually exclusive. A senior engineer can drive Copilot in the editor for everyday work and delegate the boring migrations to Devin in parallel — many teams in 2026 do exactly that.
The decision is really about where you want autonomy to live: inside your editor with you driving (Copilot), or in a sandbox VM working a Jira queue while you sleep (Devin).
Still deciding?
More productivity head-to-heads.
Receive weekly updates so you can stay up-to-date with the world of AI
Receive weekly updates so you can stay up-to-date with the world of AI
The AI tools directory for discovering, exploring, and comparing the most innovative AI tools in the industry